XXX Chats

Free dirty talking chatrooms 1 on 1

Problems with radiometric and carbon 14 dating

For potassium 40, the half-life is about 1.3 billion years.In general, in one half-life, half of the parent will have decayed.When it is stated that these methods are accurate to one or two percent, it does not mean that the computed age is within one or two percent of the correct age.

Even the creationist accounts that I have read do not adequately treat these issues.

For isochrons, which we will discuss later, the conditions are different.

If these conditions are not satisfied, the error can be arbitrarily large.

On the surface, radiometric dating methods appear to give powerful support to the statement that life has existed on the earth for hundreds of millions, even billions, of years.

We are told that these methods are accurate to a few percent, and that there are many different methods.

Comments Problems with radiometric and carbon 14 dating

  • THE END of LONG AGE RADIOMETRIC DATING
    Reply

    Nov 5, 2009. Examples of Problems with Radiometric dating of rocks Grand Canyon Lava flows Sedimentary. This is a real and common problem with radiometric dating techniques. 3 Carbon 14 in Fossils and Deep Earth Diamonds / this is the one that makes evolutionists who understand C-14 jaws drop!…

  • Is Carbon Dating Reliable?
    Reply

    For object over 4,000 years old the method becomes very unreliable for the following reason Objects older then 4,000 years run into a problem in that there are few if any known artifacts to be used as the standard. Libby, the discoverer of the C14 dating method, was very disappointed with this problem. He understood that.…

  • Radiocarbon Dating - Science Meets Religion
    Reply

    Radiocarbon dating, which is also known as carbon-14 dating, is one widely used radiometric dating scheme to determine dates of ancient artifacts. In discussions of the age of the earth and the antiquity of the human race, creationists often assail perceived weaknesses in radiocarbon dating. Henry M. Morris, for instance.…

  • Is Carbon-Dating Accurate? Radiometric dating Rate of Decay.
    Reply

    Feb 19, 2009. Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation. While there is no proof that the rates were different in the past than they are today.…